Assessment Criteria

Design

4

I think I deserve this grade because I have designed 4 designs, justifying why I chose my design and why I didn't choose the other designs against my design specification. I didn't evaluate though very critically and my explanation wasn't very detailed.

Create

5-

I have used competent techniques and methods in order to create my poster. The final product was very satisfying and I'm very proud of it. It looks professional but at the same time suitable for my audience which is a relatively young one. At the same time, I didn't label my process journal and therefore I didn't explain the changes and adaptations I made.

Evaluate

3- 

I was really proud with my evaluations but unfortunately they got deleted and I have uploaded just the Evaluation for the Investigation stage. The Investigation Evaluation was very good in herself, but all the other evaluations are missing.

Design Stage Self-Evaluation

Investigation Stage Self-Evaluation

Investigation Stage Self-Evaluation

I feel like the Investigation Stage has been more challenging than the other stages. Some steps were of course very easy: describing the problem and how it relates to me and to the community. This was quite straight forward. The difficult part was being as detailed as possible. This goes also for the Research part: I didn't imagine I had to include so much detail in my research. I am not that proud neither in my Design Brief, nor in my Design Specification and I know I can do much better. I should also comment on the reliability of my sources, which I haven't done, and compare all of my designs with the Test Plan. Having said this, I think I met the majority of the requirements and I am giving myself a 4 for the Investigation Stage.

Poster & Process Journal

Process Journal: